Quantcast
Channel: Karnataka
Viewing all 17404 articles
Browse latest View live

JD(S) withdraws candidate from Bengaluru’s Jayanagar assembly seat

$
0
0
Assembly Elections
Kalegowda has withdrawn from the contest in support of the Congress and to prevent division of secular votes.
Own work by Bikashhrd via wiki commons
Karnataka's ruling Janata Dal-Secular (JD-S) on Tuesday withdrew its candidate from the June 11 assembly election in Bengaluru's Jayanagar assembly constituency in favour of its coalition ally Congress' contestant, a party official said on Tuesday."On the directive of party supremo H.D. Deve Gowda, Kalegowda has withdrawn from the contest in support of the Congress and to prevent division of secular votes," the official told IANS. Sowmya Reddy is the daughter of veteran Congress leader and former Home Minister Ramalinga Reddy, who was re-elected from the BTM Layout segment in the city south in the May 12 assembly election. The election to the Jayanagar seat was postponed following the death of BJP candidate BN Vijaya Kumar on May 4 and re-scheduled to June 11. Vote count is on June 13. The BJP, which emerged as the single largest party in the 225-member hung assembly, on May 22 nominated BN Prahlad, younger brother of Kumar, as its candidate to retain the prestigious seat. In all, 19 candidates, including nine Independents are in the fray. The other woman candidate in the contest is Nayeema Khanum of the Praja Raita Raajya Paksha. Earlier, on June 3, as a fallout of the Congress' below par performance in the assembly elections, Karnataka North Working President SR Patil resigned from his position.  Patil tendered his resignation to party President Rahul Gandhi citing moral grounds due to the party's performance in the 2018 polls.  Patil had been a minister in the Siddaramaiah-led government from 2013 to 2018. He served as Minister for Infrastructure, Information Technology,  Biotechnology, Science and Technology, Planning and Statistics in the state government.  “I have sent my resignation to Rahul Gandhi through an email some days back after taking up moral responsibility for the party’s unsatisfactory performance in Assembly elections. Had my party won more seats from North Karnataka, we would have formed the government on our own,” Patil reportedly told mediapersons in Bengaluru.   Read: Hectic lobbying for ministerial berths in Karnataka ahead of cabinet expansion

One dog per apartment, 3 in independent house: BBMP’s new laws anger B’luru pet owners

$
0
0
Animal welfare
Animal activists fear that the new byelaws will not only lead to largescale abandonment of dogs but is a setback to adoption and foster care.
Image for representation
Manjari Chaitanya, a resident of JP Nagar in Bengaluru, is a pet parent to five dogs. Along with ill health and small children, she has an added worry to her list. “I feel like I am being harassed by the government,” she says. Manjari’s feelings are echoed by a number of people in the city, who have more than one dog. According to the recently approved BBMP pet byelaws, there is now a cap on the number of dogs you can have. While apartment dwellers can only have one, those living in independent houses can have three. This, along with several other aspects of the byelaws, have pet parents and animal activists in Bengaluru up in arms. The byelaws The byelaws, which were approved by the Karnataka government on Monday, do have a few good points such as making it mandatory for people to pick up their dog’s poop or pay a fine of Rs 100, which would be doubled the second time. It also orders the quarantine of animals with dangerous and infectious diseases. Ironically though, the BBMP does not even have a quarantine area. The most salient features of the byelaws, which are also the most controversial, are the limits imposed on the number of dogs one can have based on their lodging. Further, the notification also specifies 64 “approved breeds” which can be reared in flats and homes. Strangely, this does not include indies or strays, or even popular ones such as the Cocker Spaniel and Golden Retriever. The mandate also includes compulsory licensing and microchipping of dogs, inspection of the same by a veterinary official attached to the BBMP and capturing of dogs found to be without an “ear notch or identification mark as required under the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Programme”. These captured dogs may be taken by their owners within 72 hours after paying a fee of Rs 450. However, unclaimed dogs would be “auctioned, sent to a shelter home or detained in a dog point.” And if an unclaimed dog is found to be suffering from rabies, it can be euthanised by a veterinary officer attached to the Department of Animal Husbandry – a provision animal welfare workers say is prone to be misused to put down healthy but unwanted dogs. Fear of large scale abandonment of dogs Priya Chetty Rajagopal, founder of the CJ Memorial Trust, has been at the forefront of several pet licensing and registration drives, and has also been working with the BBMP to help strengthen their ABC programme. These new byelaws, however, have shocked and angered her. She along with citizens including a team of legal experts, have prepared a document which provides a point by point rebuttal to the BBMP’s byelaws. For instance, the rebuttal points out that while microchipping itself is an excellent idea, the byelaws do not have clarity whether this is mandatory and from when. They also argue that there is no information on cost, vendor and logistics to implement the idea. As for capping the number of dogs one can have, the rebuttal argues that this will actually create a situation where people are encouraged to abandon dogs – which, it should be noted, is punishable under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. There is also a fear that this rule will be used by apartment associations to harass residents who have dogs. And it also does not specify whether breeders, who anyway have multiple dogs, will also be penalized. Priya also argues that while the BBMP wants to capture the dogs which are over the limit of one per apartment or which are unlicensed, there is no specification of whether they even have the wherewithal to house the animals. “The city’s shelters are anyway full and overflowing. And what does it even mean when they say ‘auction’ of unclaimed dogs? They are just going to make more dogs vulnerable to breeders who can come in, buy them and then exploit them,” she says.  “The BBMP is supposed to be concentrating on ABC. Forget that, they want to punish dog owners, go inside their homes and tell them what to do with their dogs?” she fumes. Setback to adoption and foster care Sudha Narayanan, Founder Trustee of Charlie’s Animal Rescue Centre (CARE), has been receiving several calls from worried pet parents. “They ask me if they can leave their second dog at CARE. They say they are ready to pay for their upkeep if we can just keep them. We are a trauma care centre for street animals. Where do the injured and ill go if we fill all our kennels with healthy pets?” she questions. She also criticises the byelaws for making adoption even more difficult. “Many people who come to the shelter to adopt an indie are influenced by online campaigns, so they decide to bring in a second indie dog. Who will come in now that they can only have one?” Sudha also points out that these byelaws place people who foster under risk. “They almost always have more than one dog. We rely so much on fosters because there is anyway a lack of space and caregivers,” she rues. Worried pet parents in a fix Akshay Rajagopal, who has two Labradors, is also livid. “Both my labs are rescues. One of them was given to me when he was a month-old by a techie who could no longer care for him. He has been hand fed by me. These dogs do not know a life beyond my home. How can the government expect me to just give them up?” he says. Manjari, who lives in an independent house and all of whose dogs are 10 years and older, is angry at the callousness of these byelaws. “Today, when I told my four-year-old that we may have to give up two of the dogs, he simply asked me how we could do that with his ‘akkas’. When a four-year-old understands that, the BBMP cannot? These are not just for show, they are part of families for many of us,” she asserts.     However, not everyone is as strong minded as Akshay and Manjari, who are determined to not give up their dogs. “Just today, we got to know of a case where a couple was coming from Mysuru with a puppy. They got to know about this law, and they just abandoned the puppy on the highway. Now their son, who is in Bengaluru, has gone frantically searching for the dog,” Priya narrates. Despite the situation looking bleak, Priya assures that they are not going to let this injustice happen to their four-legged companions. “A PIL is also in the works and we have a legal team working on it too,” she says. Also read: Why are the most loved dog breeds also most abandoned in India?

Udupi cattle trader’s death: 3 cops, 8 Bajrang Dal activists arrested

$
0
0
Crime
The accused allegedly assaulted Hussainabba and, on discovering he was dead, tried to pass it off as a heart attack.
The death of Hussainabba, a cattle trader, has rocked Udupi district with disturbing details emerging of an attempted cover-up by the police working with Bajrang Dal activists. An internal enquiry into Hussainabba’s death has found that three police officials at Hiriadka police station colluded with Bajrang Dal activists to frame the brutal assault on the victim as a heart attack.  The enquiry led to the arrests of 11 suspects which include three policemen – Sub-inspector DN Kumar, Head Constable Mohan Kotwal and police jeep driver Gopal.  The police have also arrested local Bajrang Dal activists Suresh Mendon, Ratan, Chetan Acharya, Prasad Kondady, Umesh Shetty, Shailesh Shetty and Ganesh. The policemen have been suspended from service and all 11 accused have been remanded to judicial custody for 14 days by the Udupi District Court. The police has also arrested Jaya (37), who was travelling with Hussainabba and escaped from the scene of the crime, in connection with the incident. Udupi SP Laxman Nimbargi confirmed that the interrogation of the Bajrang Dal activists revealed the details of the incident that occurred in the early hours of May 30. One of the suspects told the Hiriadka police that at around 1 am, a pick-up truck was illegally transporting cattle and was passing through the police station's jurisdictional limits. Around 4 am, police officials along with Bajrang Dal activists Suresh Mendon, Umesh Shetty and Ratan, intercepted the vehicle near Perdoor. The perpetrators assaulted Hussainabba , damaged the vehicle and handed him over to the police. "The police officials took Hussainabba to custody, but on reaching station, they found him dead in the backseat. The policemen, who were accompanied by the suspects, ferried the body to about a kilometre away and, later during the day, registered a case of unnatural death," he said.  The policemen initially claimed that Hussainabba died of a heart attack; however, after being confronted with the statements of those arrested, the accused policemen admitted that they were acting accomplice to the alleged crime.  The SP also confirmed that the cattle was not stolen but stopped short of ruling out that the transportation was illegal. The findings of the internal enquiry brought some relief to the victim's family, who had maintained all along that there was something foul in the death of Husainabba. The police took up the probe acting on the complaint of Mohammed Ismail, Hussainabba’s younger brother. Shekunhi, the brother-in-law of the victim, said that Hussainabba was a well-known cattle trader and had a license for his trade from the village panchayat. "The external marks on Hussainabba's body made it very evident that it was not the case of heart-attack. He was very old to outrun if he was being really pursued," he said. He also alleged that two years ago, Hussainabba was stopped by Bajrang Dal activists and forced to drink cow urine. The police are awaiting the post-mortem report to confirm the actual cause of death. Meanwhile, right-wing activists belonging to the Bajrang Dal and Vishwa Hindu Parishad are organising a protest in front of the District Commissioner's office in Manipal on Wednesday against the arrests made in the case.  Content provided by www.storyinfinity.com (Subs and Scribes Media Ventures LLP).  Read: Cattle trader found dead in Udupi, family alleges Bajrang Dal hand

No BBMP, you cannot take away my dogs: Your byelaws are vicious, writes a Bengalurean

$
0
0
Blog
BBMP says that pet owners with more than the prescribed limit of dogs have to give them up for adoption.
This morning, my apartment owner came up to me and said, “Now, you cannot keep this dog in the house anymore. The BBMP has made a new rule.” She was pointing at Frejya, my Indie (stray) dog. She also insisted that I had to give up my other dogs and keep just one at home. Despite trying to explain to her that according to the draconian and utterly inhumane rule proposed by the BBMP, I could, in fact, keep one dog and that the byelaw is still under public consultation, she was not ready to listen to reason. The damage had been done. She had made up her mind and expects me to abandon my dog. “No, I read in the newspaper. The rule has been passed. You have to take your dogs and give them to a dog pound in a week. Also, they had said you cannot keep stray dogs inside the house. Apparently, they are very aggressive. What if your dog ends up biting my grandchildren?” she argued. The BBMP's new pet licensing byelaw says that someone living in an apartment can have only one dog, while those living in a house can have three dogs. What’s more, the BBMP even has an approved list of dogs that are allowed in residences – the indie or the Indian street dog is not in this list. Read: One dog per apartment, 3 in independent house: BBMP’s new laws anger B’luru pet owners Three-month-old Freyja is a sweet, goofy and an extremely friendly dog. Her presence lights up the room, her quirks can make the saddest person burst out laughing. She has the ability to perceive emotions better than most people I know and she knows when I am sad or worried about something. She pitter-patters across the living room, picks up her chew stick, jumps onto my lap and offers it to me. She believes that sharing her food or toys with me would make me happy. Frejya’s joyful disposition has got me through many miserable days. She has healed me in many ways that are indescribable. To me, Frejya is a living example of true happiness and the thought of her being taken away from me breaks my heart. The Joint Director of the BBMP’s Animal Husbandry Department, G Anand says that pet owners have to give up pet dogs above the prescribed limit for adoption, leave it in the care of relatives or find some other alternative. “The BBMP is not responsible for it. You are the pet owner, you have to put it up for adoption,” he said. What was G Anand doing when so many such “stray dogs” were on the streets, fending for themselves? Who gave BBMP the right to separate us from those we love? Where was the BBMP when Frejya was in need of a home?  The BBMP does not have the capacity to manage a single Animal Birth Control Centre or even find space for one. Sarvodaya Seva Samstha, the only one in the city was moved to Jakkur, far away from the city because the Palike could not find a proper space within city limits. Now they are out to separate us from our dogs, whom we have had for so long, whom we have grown to love. Where is the space for these dogs which it expects us to abandon? What is the guarantee that our dogs will be taken care of and not become victims of cruelty? Would any of these officials give up their children?   For our pet dogs, we are their family. We may be the ones who provide them with food and shelter, but they fill our lives with joy. Our dogs understand us. For some of us, being with our dogs may as well be the only source of happiness, the only way of coping with the world we live in. Who gave BBMP the authority to determine how many family members one gets to keep? Freyja is a family member. She cries at the sight of me leaving home for work. She jumps with joy when I return. Bengaluru has numerous dogs that have been abandoned. Volunteers from animal shelters are struggling to find loving homes for these dogs. Where will all these forcefully abandoned dogs go? When the Joint Director can say that BBMP is not responsible, then who is? Where is the “larger interest of the public” in this insensitive, inhumane and vicious byelaw? I directly perceive this a threat to me. No, the BBMP cannot take away my family from me. I will fight this until I know that the incompetent Palike understands how cruel this rule is. Until the Joint Director and people like him realise that tearing apart families is in no way in the larger public interest. Hundreds of dog lovers in Bengaluru and I will take you on and we will win. We will not allow you to bring upon sorrow and misery in the lives of so many dogs and their owners. I say, bring it on. Views expressed are author's own

BBMP's 'approved' dog breeds list makes no sense, and is eerily similar to Singapore's

$
0
0
Animal welfare
From an arbitrary list of 'approved dog breeds' to excluding stakeholders from discussions, BBMP's byelaws have several flaws.
The BBMP’s pet dog licensing byelaws, approved on Monday, have incensed several people in Bengaluru. What has caught the most attention is the limit on the number of dogs one can have, based on whether they live in an apartment (one dog) or an independent house (three dogs). However, what’s made the byelaws even more unpopular with pet owners and dog lovers in the city is a list of “approved” dog breeds that can be kept as pets in residential apartments. While uncommon breeds like Affenpinscher, Australian Silky Terrier, Bichon Frise and Coton de tulear are on the list, it does not include popular ones like Golden Retrievers, Beagles or the Indie (stray dogs).  “It appears that there has been no homework, no conversation with those who have pets to understand their feelings towards their four-legged companion. It seems like a shoddy copy paste job from a foreign law,” says Dr Pawan, a veterinary surgeon with Cessna in Bengaluru. And it appears that he may be right, for this list bears eerie similarity to another one put up by the Singapore Housing and Development Board. The Bengaluru list adds the Mudhol, Labrador and Dalmation, but the rest appear to be the same. Here is the list of dog breeds allowed as pets in Bengaluru: This is the list of dog breeds allowed as pets in Singapore: Most of the breeds approved by BBMP, save those like Labrador and Dalmation, seem to be small dogs.   Dr Pawan says that Golden Retrievers, Dobermans, Labradors, German Shepherds, Beagles, Pugs and the Indian stray form a majority of the pets that people have. “We do have the rare exotic breed – but their owners are usually villa owners who have the space and the resources to maintain and care for the breed,” he says. He, like many other pet owners and animal welfare activists, agrees that the list seems to be a badly researched attempt at streamlining pets in the city. According to a rebuttal to these byelaws put together by concerned citizens and legal experts under the CJ Memorial Trust, the following reasons make the demarcation of “approved” breeds problematic. They argue that some of the breeds are unheard of, and say it appears as though the BBMP is trying to promote some breeders. The byelaws also do not specify what will happen if someone has a large dog or one of the non-approved breeds. “It is also a setback to the whole ‘Adopt Don’t Shop‘ campaign which we have been working so hard towards. Anyway the families which come to shelters to adopt indies are looking to take it as their second dog. Now with the one dog per apartment limit, who will take the indies in?” questions Sudha Narayanan, Founder Trustee of Charlie’s Animal Rescue Centre (CARE). And even though the list seems to promote smaller breeds, the CJ Memorial Trust’s rebuttal points out that it does not include popular small dogs such as the Cocker Spaniel. What makes these byelaws even more problematic is that they are retrospective. “It is very simple – you cannot ask people who have dogs to give them up,” Dr Pawan says. “The idea behind the byelaws seems to have been to regulate pets and their rearing in the city but the way they have gone about it is not good. They could have started with having checks on the space, financial capacity and other facilities a person can provide if they want a particular breed from the time of implementation. But they have not done that,” he adds. Several outspoken animal lovers and activists also say that the BBMP should be concentrating on Animal Birth Control (ABC). Dr Pawan agrees. “This situation would not have arisen if the authorities concentrated on ABC and had proper registration and licensing of pets in the first place. They would have known then what breeds are popular in the city and not come up with this badly researched list,” Dr Pawan says.

Karnataka cabinet expansion: 23 MLAs of Cong-JD(S) coalition take oath as ministers

$
0
0
Karnataka 2018
N Mahesh of the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) was also sworn in. The BSP is a pre-poll ally of the JD(S).
The Janata Dal(Secular)-Congress coalition government in Karnataka was expanded on Wednesday, with the induction of 25 legislators as cabinet ministers including 23 from the alliance partners and one BSP MLA and an Independent. Of the 23 from the alliance, 14 are from Congress and 9 from JD(S). Governor Vajubhai R Vala administered the oath of office and secrecy to the ministers at Raj Bhavan in the city centre. Former Kannda actress and legislative council member Jayamala of the Congress is the lone woman minister. N Mahesh of the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) was also sworn in. The BSP is a pre-poll ally of the JD(S). KJPJ MLA R Shankar, who supported the alliance, is another cabinet minister. Besides Chief Minister HD. Kumaraswamy of the JD(S) and Deputy Chief Minister G Parameshwara of the Congress, senior leaders and several legislators of both the alliance partners and senior officials were present at the hour-long ceremony. The 14 legislators of the Congress and nine of the JD-S took oath in Kannada and in the name of either god, Allah, 14th century Kannadiga social reformer Basavanna and parents. Among the Congress ministers were RV Deshpande, DK Shivakumar, KJ George, Krishna Byre Gowda, Shiva Shankar Reddy, Ramesh Jarkiholi, Priyank Kharge, UT Abdul Khader, Zameer Ahmed Khan, Shivanand Patil, Venkat Ramanappa, Rajsekhar Basavaraj Patil, Puttaranga Shetty and Jayamala. Among the JD(S) ministers are HD Revanna, Bandeppa Kashempur, GT Deve Gowda, DC Thammanna, MC Managuli, SR Srinivas, Venkatrao Nadegouda, CS Puttaraju and SR Mahesh. Revanna is the second son of JD(S) supremo HD Deve Gowda and elder brother of Kumarmaswamy. He represents Holenarsipur assembly segment from Hassan district. Priyank is the son of Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge from Chittapur in Kalaburgi district.

Karnataka trial court frames charges against Nithyananda in rape case

$
0
0
Crime
Nithyananda is accused of raping his disciple for close to five years during her stay in the ashram.
The law seems to be finally catching up with self-styled godman Nithyananda, who is likely to face the same fate as that of godmen Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh and Asaram Bapu, who are languishing in jail on charges of rape and sexual assault.  The Third Additional District and Session Court in Ramanagara on Tuesday framed charges against 44-year-old Nithyananda and others, in a case that has seen several twists and turns over eight years. During the course of trial, Nithyananda first said that he was impotent and later changed his stance to claim that he had consensual sex with the survivor who was his disciple. He is accused of raping the disciple for close to five years during her stay in the ashram under the garb of spirituality. Nithyananda will now face trial under Sections 376 (rape), 377 (unnatural sex), 420 (cheating), 114 (criminal abetment), 201 (disappearance of evidence, giving false information), 120B (criminal conspiracy) and other charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Read: From impotency to having 'consensual sex': Nithyananda changes tune in rape case The other accused are: Shiva Vallabhaneni alias Nithya Sachidananda (A3); Danasekaran alias Nithya Sadananda (A4); Ragini alias Maa Nithya Sachidananda (A5); and Jamuna Rani alias Maa Nithyananda (A6).  All the accused including Nithyananda who were present in the court on Tuesday pleaded not guilty.  Incidentally, the second accused Gopala Sheelam Reddy alias Nithya Bhakthananda (A2) did not appear in court citing health reasons. The Sessions Court Judge on Tuesday also issued a non-bailable warrant against Reddy after noting his plea as “non acceptable”. The prosecution argued that his health condition was “beyond complicated”. “It is highly impossible to accept the contention of the second accused that he is physically not fit to attend the court proceedings. Thus, it is held that the health grounds urged by the second accused is not acceptable one,” the trial court noted. It further stated, “This court is of the opinion that accused No 2 with an intention to drag the proceedings is not appearing before the court.” Sources told TNM that Reddy runs a real estate business in Florida, United States. The next date of hearing has been fixed on June 14. Background Till date, Nithyananda has been arrested twice and got bail from higher courts and successfully delayed the start and proceedings of trial. Nithyananda has been in the centre of controversy since 2010, when multiple regional channels had broadcasted a clip of the godman in a compromising position with an actor. Lenin Karuppan, a former disciple, had exposed the controversial figure and registered a complaint with Chennai police in 2010. A case under Sections 295 A (insulting religious belief), 420 (cheating), 376 (rape), 377 (unnatural sex), 506 (i) (criminal Intimidation) and 120 B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC was registered against Nithyananda in 2010 by Ramanagara police, after the case was transferred to them. Nithyananda is also mired in other controversies in India and abroad.  The Madras High Court had warned Nithyananda of compromising with the truth in his affidavit, in a case involving his removal as the pontiff at the Madurai Adheenam Mutt.  Recently, towards the end of May, the Karnataka High Court had pulled up the local police for not probing a suspicious death in his ashram on the outskirts of Bengaluru. The victim’s mother had accused Nithyananda and his aides of assaulting her daughter.  Besides this, there were two other suspicious deaths in his ashram. Also read: Sexual crimes committed in the name of God: A look back at 'Swami' Nithyananda's 'sex contract'

Pro-Kannada groups go from theatre to theatre ensuring ‘Kaala’ isn’t screened in B’luru

$
0
0
Controversy
The fringe groups, who started canvassing from 2 am, have allegedly received verbal communication from several theatre owners that they won’t screen the film on Thursday.
The release of actor-politician Rajinikanth’s Kaala on Thursday was marred by minor incidents of violence in Bengaluru, despite the Karnataka High Court asking the police to ensure the screenings take place smoothly. From 2 am, pro-Kannada groups have travelled to various theatres and malls across the city to ensure the movie isn’t screened in the city. These fringe groups are protesting against the statements made by Rajini on the Cauvery verdict. At the time of writing this article, the popular online booking site BookMyShow did not display any show timings for the movie. In one of the first incidents, members of a pro-Kannada organisations, Karunada Seva Karu, vandalised banners and posters of the film outside Balaji Talkies theatre in Vivek Nagar. Some Tamil-speaking residents of the area gathered to oppose the vandalism and an altercation broke out. However, the police was quickly called in and they ensure the matter did not escalate.   Rupesh Rajanna, president of the Karunada Seva Karu, appealed to locals to support the protesters and claimed that they are not opposed to Tamils, but only to Rajinikanth for his statements on the Cauvery dispute. In another incident, members of the Karnataka Rakshana Vedike, headed by Praveen Shetty, led a protest at Lido Mall in the city centre where the movie was set to release at 10 am. Members of the group claim that they spoke to the manager of the theatre and allegedly got a verbal confirmation from him that the movie was won’t be screened on Thursday. Shortly before 10 am, the members of the faction broke out in celebrations after it was understood that the screening was stalled. They later headed to Mantri and Orion malls, which have also allegedly agreed not to screen the movie. In other major theatres, police were stationed outside from as early as 6 am anticipating violence. "We want a total ban on the release of the film in Bengaluru. Rajini is not important for us, but Cauvery is. Not today, not tomorrow, not a year after this. The film should be banned until Rajini takes back the comment about giving water to Tamil children," Praveen Shetty told TNM. Karnataka Rakshana Vedike members protest the release of Rajinikanth starrer 'Kaala' at Bengaluru's Lido Mall. Vedike members are on a drive to stop the release of the film in all theaters in the city and are now headed to Mantri Mall. pic.twitter.com/vmWguOfBPu— Prajwal (@prajwalmanipal) June 7, 2018 The unofficial ban called by pro-Kannada organisations against Kaala has the personal support of Sa Ra Govindu, President of the Karnataka FIlm Chamber who is close to Vatal Nagaraj, the President of Kannada Chaluvali Vatal Paksha - the face of the pro-Kannada protests. Even CM Kumaraswamy had said, “As a CM, I have to implement the direction of High Court, it's my responsibility. As an individual, as a Kannadiga, I request the producer of the movie that in this kind of atmosphere, it is not good on their part to release the movie. As a producer and distributor, I can say that even if they release the movie, it won’t be useful to them financially.” On Tuesday, theatre owners and distributors had agreed to screen the movie, however, Kumaraswamy’s statement seems to have emboldened these fringe groups. On Thursday, members of the KFCC are set to join the protests at Mysore Bank Circle headed by Vatal Nagaraj and others against the screening of the film. However, the film will allegedly release from Friday, with a tacit understanding between the film producers, theatre owners and the protesters. A source told TNM, “There was an agreement that no one will be allowed to screen the film on Thursday. From Friday, it’s up to the theatre owner to run the film or not. Given the financial repercussions of such a ban, it was decided to limit it to a single day..”

Will provide stable government for next 5 years: K'taka CM Kumaraswamy

$
0
0
Karnataka 2018
"I have already directed officials to attend the problems related to potholes in Bengaluru and relief works in rain-hit districts across the state," said Kumaraswamy.
Allaying fears over the survival of the JD(S) -Congress coalition ministry, Karnataka Chief Minister H.D. Kumaraswamy on Wednesday said the alliance partners would provide a stable government for the next five years."I would like to tell the sceptics that we will provide a stable and efficient government, which will last its full five-year term. Let there be no uncertainty about it," he told reporters after chairing the first meeting of the expanded cabinet. Miffed over media reports on the longevity of the government due to delay in cabinet expansion and allocation of portfolios, Kumaraswamy said as the May 12 election threw up a hung Assembly, the alliance partners had to form the government after the three-day BJP government fell for want of numbers on May 19."Forming a coalition government and selecting legislators for the ministry take time as we have to do justice to all the stakeholders and in sharing the cabinet posts as alliance partners," he said. Seeking a breathing time to settle down and get the official machinery cracking, the Chief Minister said he and Deputy Chief Minister G. Parameshwara have been working overtime from the day they assumed office on May 23 to address governance issues."I have already directed officials to attend the problems related to potholes in Bengaluru and relief works in rain-hit districts across the state," said Kumaraswamy. Endorsing Kumaraswamy's views, Parameshwara said the coalition government would be responsible and accountable to the people in delivering the services."There is no confusion or uncertainty about the function of the government. The Chief Minister will allot the portfolios for all the ministers, including me, in a day or two and everybody will start working hard," he said. Admitting that there was disgruntlement in some of the legislators left out of the cabinet expansion, Parameshwara, who is also the Congress' state unit President, said their concerns would be addressed and given opportunity to serve in other ways."Though there are five-six cabinet berths vacant to be filled by our party, the Congress has just 22 posts for its legislators, including me, as the state cabinet can have only 34 ministers, with 12 from the JD(S) , including its Chief Minister," clarified Parameshwara. The Congress and JD(S)  are hoping to quell the brewing dissidence in both the parties by assuring their legislators of making them chairmen of the various statutory boards and corporations with cabinet rank.   Also read: No BBMP, you cannot take away my dogs: Your byelaws are vicious, writes a Bengalurean 

Victory for Bengaluru pet owners? BBMP’s plans to limit number of pet dogs put on hold

$
0
0
Animal welfare
Bengaluru Mayor Sampath Raj made the announcement after meeting with pet owners and animal activists on Wednesday.
Photo by Abhipalsinghjadon1 via Wiki Commons
It has only been three days since the BBMP stirred a controversy by announcing that its new pet licensing byelaws had been approved by the Urban Development Secretariat. But thanks to proactive campaigning and pressure from dog lovers and pet owners in the city, the byelaws have now been put on hold. The byelaws mandated that apartment dwellers could only have one dog per apartment and those in independent houses could have only three. Further, the BBMP also put out an “approved” list of breeds that could be reared in Bengaluru apartments. Not only did the list appear heavily plagiarised from a similar one published by the Singapore Housing and Development Board, but it did not include popular breeds such as the Golden Retriever, Cocker Spaniel, Beagle or the Indian stray (indie). Also read: BBMP's 'approved' dog breeds list makes no sense, and is eerily similar to Singapore's What drew even more ire was that the byelaws were retrospective – which meant that people who already have more than one pet or a non-approved breed were required to give them up. Bengaluru Mayor Sampath Raj, who met with pet owners and animal activists like Sanjana Madappa, Chinthana Gopinath and Priya Chetty Rajagopal on Wednesday, acknowledged the anger and concerns of pet parents in the city. “In many apartments, there is more than one dog and people are keeping them as pets. The dogs are like family members. And to suddenly abandon any dog is like giving away their son or daughter, which they don’t want to do,” the Mayor said. “And most of the second or third pets adopted by them are stray dogs which are not being maintained well by the BBMP… We are withholding this [byelaws] until we further discuss with the council and we’ll talk to our officers as well. Till the time we take a final decision, let the status quo remain,” he added. The Mayor also acknowledged the ‘Not Without My Dog’ movement on social media which hundreds of concerned dog lovers and pet owners joined in. On Wednesday evening, in fact, the hashtag trended on Twitter, with people strongly opposing the BBMP’s draconian and ill-thought byelaws. They posted photos of their dogs, expressed that the canines were a part of their family and promised to fight the authorities if they tried to take away their furry companions. There were a few witty memes in the mix too. Check out some of the tweets below. Dear @BBMPCOMM , Pls fix the SWDs, potholes, and infrastructure. Revive the lakes. Stop blaming other parastatals for your failures. Don't come into my home and say how many dogs I can own. #NotWithoutMyDog https://t.co/IiF06iZrdn— Theja Ram (@thejaram92) June 6, 2018 BBMP's 'approved' dog breeds list makes no sense. And they are so disingenuous that they seem to have plaigirised a list from Singapore. Indian dogs not allowed it seems. #notwithoutmydog https://t.co/gm3bWk4naM— Dhanya Rajendran (@dhanyarajendran) June 7, 2018 Hey #BBMP When I said I felt like Bolognese, I meant pasta, not dog. Here's my little paralysed #indiannativedog who didn't make it to your "approved breeds" list. Can he stay? He can't walk or anything. @BBMP_MAYOR @BBMPCOMM #NotWithoutMyDog pic.twitter.com/CzI7PMuKOt— Anoopa Anand (@LeftarmSpinster) June 6, 2018 I have 2 sons. They want me to give up one. What if they asked you to do that? What would you do?#BBMP#NotWithoutMyDog @BBMPCommissioner @BBMPMayor @AnushkaSharma @iamsrk @imVkohli @msdhoni @TheJohnAbraham @R_Khanna @shahidkapoor @mrsfunnybones @akshaykumar @Raghu_Dixit @trdp pic.twitter.com/zja2FtTsCb — Awanti Agarwala (@a_awanti) June 6, 2018 Boneafite's take on the new mandate by BBMP about one dog per flat and three per individual house!! Please read the article below and comment your views.https://t.co/GazBo4tAJo … …#BBMP #LoveAllDogsAlike #BoneafitesTakeOnBBMPMandate #NotWithoutMyDog #Bangalore pic.twitter.com/6v51xClgBz — Boneafite (@boneafite) June 6, 2018 I am a father to my 4 dogs at home and to the multiple on the streets. And i would like people to try to BS me on 'auction your pets' or 'choose the favourite one' or worse try taking them away from me.#NotWithoutMyDogs#BBMP#NotWithoutMyDog @BBMPCOMM@BBMP_MAYOR@BBMP pic.twitter.com/1TTjwMRVYi— Ankur Bhatnagar (@lpFyyUbGx84UqUi) June 6, 2018 See man #BBMP. Everyone is making fun of you. This is not cool. You're just coming off looking like a clown, because your bye laws are under-researched and your logic, malnourished. Be wise. Talk to your citizens. @BBMP_MAYOR @BBMPCOMM #NotWithoutMyDog pic.twitter.com/FtPrtG2JpR— Anoopa Anand (@LeftarmSpinster) June 6, 2018 A lab rescued beagle came home to me 2 yrs ago & has courageously started trusting humans again as I strive to give him a normal loved life. He sleeps, eats & goes on trips with us. Dare & try to take him away BBMP, a mother will fight like you have never known. #NotWithoutMyDog pic.twitter.com/SDpZaTwp9e— Yogini Gulkotwar (@GYogini) June 6, 2018 #BBMP - there are other things you need to pay attention to, not curbing how many kids I can have in MY apartment. #notwithoutmydog #sanitizeBBMP #getaholdofyourself #petdaddy #notwithyou #petparent #revamptherules #pathetic pic.twitter.com/WDqevjlFIc — Sanjeev Nair (@_sanjeevnair) June 6, 2018 Maya and Lucy are at our shelter because of your failed ABC program! Thank you @bbmp_mayor @BBMPCOMM #NotWithoutMyDog pic.twitter.com/m026krsIpG — Mandy Vasudevan (@MandyVasudevan) June 6, 2018 When you can't even get married without your kids around. #NotWithoutMyDog pic.twitter.com/FrJA7kMOOW— Sahitya Madhavan (@SahityaMadhavan) June 6, 2018 #notwithoutmydog@BBMP_MAYOR The one dog one apartment Proposed rule is unacceptable .we want this withdrawn immediately @siddaramaiah @hd_kumaraswamy @rajeevgowda @krishnabgowda @thekjgeorge @dineshgrao pic.twitter.com/oIOzoWdYHq — Dipali Sikand (@SikandDipali) June 5, 2018 Would you ask anyone to.giveup a family member? Would you actually give them up even if asked?! @BBMP_MAYOR #NotWithoutMyDogs #NotWithoutMyDog pic.twitter.com/edcQPx875b — Devisri Sarkar (@DevisriSarkar) June 6, 2018   A post shared by Arpita Bhattacharya (@isshshsh) on Jun 6, 2018 at 11:39am PDT  I love Bangalore so much , anyone who knows me can vouch for that !ever since that fateful day , when I left that city.. I have always been craving to go back. . . However, this is first time today I feel happy to have left that place... Honestly I could not have this thought for a moment ...that I have to give up on either of my kids. . .. . #bbmp you are as horrid as you can be. Who the hell have given you the rights to come inside our homes and decide for our families. . . Our babies are off limits for u ! Stay away. . . Friends in blore : all pet parents stand by you. Fight this out for all of us #notwithoutmydog A post shared by Soumi Dey Sarkar (@soumi_ds) on Jun 6, 2018 at 11:27am PDT  BBMP,Limit on number of dogs in a house is unacceptable. Please withdraw this thoughtless law. #NOTWITHOUTMYDOG #PETSAREFAMILY A post shared by Barks 'n Licks (@barksnlicks) on Jun 6, 2018 at 10:50pm PDT  #notwithoutmydog #bbmp #bengaluru #takebackyourwords A post shared by Garima Gupta (@garimagupta21) on Jun 6, 2018 at 11:00pm PDT  Here to share my thoughts on BBMP's rules. I still can't believe that they are laying restrictions on pet owners. When there are so many problems in India yet to be solved, from nowhere, BBMP comes with this pathetic, inapt & immoral plan to cause hardship to us and our loved ones. There are so many pet lovers who provide food, affection and safety to many homeless animals. They wander the street and are exposed to danger all the time. It is we who extend our love to them. To be frank, it's the govt which is supposed to be doing all this. And if you had been doing it right, then why are so many animals still wandering the streets, suffering without adequate food, shelter, and exposed to so many diseases, every single day? It's a shame for our government that many private animal aid organisations are doing a better job in taking care of such animals. An other fact, Though there is no official order, Chennai corporation parks never allows our pets to accompany us. How cruel is that? First give our dogs space to run! Then let's think about laying rules. I'm sure every pet owner regards his/her pets as family members. And asking to give up a family member is just insane. Most of us even do our duty when it comes to parenting and training the dog. Even if the government is not taking initiatives to save other animals, I kindly request you to just sit back and watch us, do your job. Do feel free to extend your hands of help, but don't be a hindrance to us and our loved ones. Earth is to be shared equally with all the living souls. I hereby show my support, not only to my dog but also to every single animal on this planet. Withdraw this rule BBMP. #notwithoutmydog A post shared by P £ {\} ¢ [-] U (@shvan_the_polygarhound) on Jun 6, 2018 at 10:10pm PDT A source from the expert committee, which was originally formed to formulate the pet licensing laws, said that they would take the public opinion into account during further consultation on the matter. While there is no official word or redaction yet from the Urban Development Secretariat, activists who have spoken up against the byelaws are optimistic and believe that the provisions will ultimately not hold. Also read: No BBMP, you cannot take away my dogs: Your byelaws are vicious, writes a Bengalurean

Were Girish Karnad and Chandrashekar Patil also targets of Gauri's killers? SIT probes

$
0
0
Crime
Suspect Amol Kale's diary had the names of writers and rationalist thinkers Girish Karnad, Chandrashekhar Patil, KS Bhagvan, Bargur Ramachandrappa and BT Lalita Nayak in it.
The Special Investigation team probing Gauri lankesh’s murder has stumbled on a larger plot that was being hatched against rationalists in Karnataka. The SIT believes that the diary found in the possession of suspected mastermind of the murder – Amol Kale from Pune, also had a list of names of other rationalists from Karnataka, who were allegedly the gang’s next targets. According to highly placed sources in the SIT, Amol Kale's diary had the names of writers and rationalist thinkers Girish Karnad, Chandrashekhar Patil, KS Bhagvan, Bargur Ramachandrappa and BT Lalita Nayak in it. “We have good reason to believe that these persons were also being targeted. When KT Naveen Kumar was arrested, it was in connection with the information we received regarding a plot to kill KS Bhagwan. Naveen Kumar’s confession statement says that there was a plan to ‘eliminate anti-Hindu people’,” the source said. Although Naveen Kumar had allegedly told the SIT that his handler’s name was Praveen, it took the investigators months to uncover Praveen’s true identity. “We had to intercept calls of over 200 suspected fringe elements to figure out that Praveen’s name is Sujeet Kumar. He has many aliases. Praveen is one of them,” the source said. To the SIT’s dismay, Praveen had gone underground by then. Investigators then reached out to those who knew Praveen and a few informants kept them in the loop regarding his whereabouts. “He never used first names. He would say Dada, Bhaisab instead of the real names of the gang members. He had code names for the logistical supplies the gang was using for the murder as well. Like aurat for the targeted woman and in this case Gauri Lankesh. Bulb is the CCTV cameras, channa was for bullets and ghoda was the weapon. Even the way he constructed sentences was bizarre and sounded like code language,” the source said. Finally, in April this year, Praveen resurfaced and the SIT believes it was to execute a plan to kill popular writer KS Bhawan. “The Upparpet police arrested him with live bullets and upon interrogation, it was revealed that he was involved in the plot to kill KS Bhagwan. Since KT Naveen Kumar had already informed us about Praveen, we had proof to arrest him. It was his arrest which led us to Amol Kale, Amit Degvekar and Manohar Edave, who were also part of the gang,” SIT sources said. Who is Sujeet Kumar alias Praveen? A native of Shivamogga’s Shikaripura, Sujeet Kumar alias Praveen had pursued a diploma in polytechnic but dropped out of college. SIT sources say that it was after he attended a few workshops of Hindu Janajgruthi Samiti in Goa’s Ponda area that he began showing interest in their activities. “He began building up a network of people who were linked to radical groups. But it was only in June 2017 that Praveen first met KT Naveen Kumar at a convention organised by one of these radical pro-Hindutva outfits,” the source said. According to the source, KT Naveen Kumar was roped in to the plot to kill Gauri Lankesh only in the final stages of planning “Based on the information we have received, Praveen was impressed with the way Naveen Kumar had organised the kill and had tasked him with formulating a plan to kill KS Bhagwan. We do not know if any of these men was the actual shooter. We are trying to match the physical attributes of the shooter with those of the accused. Also, we have not made public the name of the organisation they belonged to. This is because Praveen, Amol, Amit and Manohar say that they were not affiliated to any outfit but had committed the crime only with the purpose of eliminating who they believed were anti-Hindu people,” the source added.

Video of K’taka BJP MLA urging leaders to ‘work for Hindus, not for Muslims’ sparks row

$
0
0
Controversy
Basangouda Patil Yatnal later defended his words at a press conference, asking if it is “wrong to speak in favour of Hindus?”
Basangouda Patil Yatnal, the BJP MLA from Bijapur City, has stirred controversy on Thursday with a video of his emerging in which he appears to urge elected representatives like corporators to "work for Hindus and not for Muslims". In a press conference later in the day, he defended his statement and asked if it is “wrong to speak in favour of Hindus?” The video, most probably recorded in a cell phone, shows the former Union Minister of State speaking at a private event, and the stage he’s on has a poster of Shivaji at the back. "Muslims have started this new thing of first saying Jai Bheem and then As-salamu-alaykum. They send messages on WhatsApp asking Muslims to not buy items from Hindu shops because Hindus support Bajrang Dal and Shiv Sena by taking that money. But then how does he remember Jai Bheem? Dalits are downtrodden people. By taking their name they want to divide the society with a Dalit-Muslim combination," he is heard saying, drawing applause from the crowd.   He further stated that elected  representatives like corporators should work for Hindus. "I called corporators and told them you should work in favour of Hindus and not Muslims,” he said to raucous cheers from the crowd. He continued by adding that he had asked not to allow Muslims in his office. "Because, who voted for me in Bijapur?” To this, the crowd is heard saying “Hindus”. “I had said no to Muslims before itself. I had told my people that those who wear burqas and skullcaps should not come to my office," he further added. However, it is unclear how old the video is. It is speculated that it could have been shot on Shivaji Jayanti, in February this year. The video, which went viral on social media, drew strong criticism. In a meeting with reporters on Thursday, things became heated when he was questioned by the media."There was a Shivaji programme and I had said that our people suffered injustice and I have said that action must be taken regarding it. In this country, is it wrong to speak in favour of Hindus? Is satisfying minorities enough for you?" a visibly angry Yatnal asked.   He also claimed that Muslims did not vote for him even when he was in the JD(S). "Have Muslims voted for me? Even when I was with JDS? Why are you speaking in favour of them?" he further questioned. Yatnal was the Minister of State, Textiles, and Minister of State, Railways, in the third Vajpayee government. However, he joined the JD(S) in 2010 and later returned to the BJP earlier this year amid  much fanfare. He contested and won the elections to the Legislative Council as an Independent in 2015 and was elected  as the MLA of Bijapur City in the state Assembly elections held on May 15.

Bengaluru’s shaky Varthur bridge yet to be repaired, leaving motorists in fear

$
0
0
Civic Issues
While Bengaluru Mayor Sampath Raj had earlier promised that the bridge would be repaired by the first week of June, the BBMP now says it will be completed in the third week of July.
File image
More than two weeks have passed since Benglauru’s Varthur bridge started shaking, causing panic among motorists. The bridge is vital as it connects Varthur with Whitefield. BBMP, however, is yet to start repair work. As a temporary measure, traffic police have placed a ban on heavy vehicles crossing the bridge, as was recommended by a panel of experts on June 1. Although, residents say that the police have been doing a good job of stopping heavy vehicles from getting onto the bridge, there have been occasions, where trucks having gotten onto it.  “The repair work has not started, at least we can’t see or are aware of. We are told they are looking out for contractors. For now, they (police) have banned trucks on the bridge. I have personally seen police on both sides of the bridge stopping heavy vehicles on a daily basis. I have heard the same from my colleagues,” Nooraine Fazal, a local resident told TNM. But other commuters feel that the police action has not been sufficient. Sukesh, who commutes from Varthur Police Station side to Yamlur, claimed that every now and then there are trucks which slip through during odd hours. “There won’t be any truck from morning 8am to evening 8pm usually. But there are times when there are no police to stop the trucks,” he said. Another commuter, Raghu echoed the same. He even posted a video of a trucks getting on the bridge at around 7am on June 3. But a constable at the Whitefield Traffic Police Station claimed that the bridge is being manned 24x7.   @bjparvind ji Saturday I found even there is a cop at varthur Kodi junction he allowed heavy goods vehicle by taking bribe. M posting this to ur notice sir. @blrcitytraffic need to answer for it. pic.twitter.com/P0R8bFU8PE — Raghu.BS (@RaghuBS2) June 3, 2018   Bengaluru Mayor Sampath Raj had earlier assured motorists that the bridge would be repaired by the first week of June. But BBMP now claims that the repairs would take until the third week of July to be completed. BBMP Chief Engineer for Major Roads S Somasekhar admitted that the work had been getting delayed. He blamed it on the lack of availability of specialised tools and man power required for this specific task. He assured the public that work would start rolling before the end of the week. “We have drafted all the necessary actions. Tests have been conducted. Work is going on very slowly as there is a need for highly specialised skilled labourers. All of these are being arranged. Moreover, there are tools like milling machines which we don’t have in Bengaluru. There are many specialised processes these are not ordinary labour works, so we need specialised labour in batches,” S Somasekhar said defensively.  

India’s first ever solar powered brewery now open in Mysuru

$
0
0
Environment
AB InBev’s Brewery in the temple town of T Narasipura, 45 minutes away from Mysuru will brew Budweiser from 100% renewable energy.
The factory stands out amidst the endless greenery of T Narasipura, a quiet temple town in Mysuru district of Karnataka, where Anheuser-Busch (AB InBev), the Belgian-Brazilian company and world’s biggest beer producer, have set up the brewery on a 64 acre plot. Unlike, the 9 others breweries owned by AB InBev in India, the SPR brewery in T Narasipura is one-of-its kind in the country. The one-year-old brewery which had been running on conventional energy, has been transformed entirely into a state-of-the art solar powered unit in 2018, a big achievement in terms of making new inroads into carbon reduction in the country. And it does not end here.  The company, as part of its sustainability initiatives, has promised that every Budweiser in India will be brewed on 100% renewable electricity. And T Narasipura has become the ground zero from which this initiative will spread out. The brewery is one among 17 units operated (10 owned and 7 on contract basis) by AB InBev in India and the fourth brewery producing Budweiser in the country. Apart from Bud, the beer giant produces several brands including Corona, Stella Artois, Hoegaarden, Leffe, Beck’s Ice. Two years ago, the company also purchased SabMiller, with a 100 million-dollar deal and now produces Fosters, Knockout, Haywards 5000, Haywards 10000 among others. How T Narasipura’s Brewery turned green The company entered into a power purchase agreement with Canadian renewable energy firm AMP and promised to buy 3.6 gigawatt hours per year for ten years for the Narasipura brewery. With this agreement, the brewery is set to become AB InBev’s third unit in the world to turn green. While, two others located in the USA function on 100% renewable energy, the Karnataka unit too will turn fully green by 2025. But for now, all the Budweisers in this brewery which produces Knockout and Beck’s Ice as well, will be brewed on 100% renewable energy. On why Karnataka’s SPR was chosen out of the company’s several other owned units in India, Gagandeep Sethi, Director of Supply and Logistic for AB InBev, India said, “The Narasipura brewery fared the best when we conducted a test study for setting up an off-site solar power field. The test was done in August last year and we decided to turn this unit green as it would produce the best impact where we could maximise the potential,” However, the decision did come with its own set of challenges. “We are brewing experts, not experts in green energy. So we decided to rope in AMP. India is a fairly new market so challenges related to procurement, right solutions etc. kept cropping up,” he said. The brewery is presently functioning on 75% solar power. The solar fields set up by AMP will generate 30 MWAC of power which will be directed to the brewery. And how much carbon emission would it reduce? “Say the brewery consumes 10-15 kilowatt hours per hectolitre of beer produced, it will consume 1 million kilowatt hours for 750 hectolitres of beer which we produce. Turning this unit green means that we can save 1 million kilowatt hours of electrical energy for the beer we brew. Currently, we function at 80% of this but we will soon make it 100% renewable,” Ganagandeep Sethi added. The firm also looks to locally produce and source barley for their breweries in India. Tests were conducted in Uttar Pradesh and Haryana for smart barley to be grown in the city. “We need our beers to taste the same. The barley we use in Budweiser is not locally produced in India. Last year, we grew the seeds in patches as pilot projects to test their growth in the country. The tests turned positive showing that barley used for Bud could be grown locally in India. This is a huge step and we have the heads up to start commercially growing the crop in India. We will provide farmers with the seeds and educate them on how to cultivate this. We will then procure the barley from them for brewing,” said Jan Clisner. VP of Procurements, APAC, in AB InBev. Turning Malliyuru village green The brewers have turned the neighbouring village of Malliyuru green by donating to the gram panchayat three e-rickshaws or solar powered autos which can be used to transport villagers to the main road. “Street lights have also been set up to ensure that women coming back from work at odd hours in the village feel safe and secure. Prior to this, there weren’t many streetlights and village roads were dark. We have used solar energy and set up lights and we will eventually illuminate an entire stretch of the village,” said a spokesperson for AB in Bev. The firm has also set up several water purification centers and water ATMs in and around Karnataka to improve people’s access to clean water. “Our efforts with regard to water are two-fold. Outside of the brewery, we have set up water filters and water ATMs for the people. Inside of the brewery, we have the latest recycling technologies and work out ways to reuse the waste water,” Gagandeep added. However, water remains a major concern that is yet to be addressed. On an average, a brewery uses 10 litres of water for every 1 litre of beer brewed. This includes for cooling and other activities. With Karnataka’s ongoing battle for Cauvery water and Bengaluru’s water crisis, the attempts by breweries who use up a tonne of water for their manufacturing process, to save and reuse water would not help much.

After three consecutive drought years, will Karnataka finally see a good monsoon?

$
0
0
Weather
While the IMD has predicted below normal rainfall this year, scientists are saying it’s too early to say if there will be a drought again.
Representational image
Monsoon in Karnataka may have arrived under favourable conditions but weathermen are not fully convinced if there is reason for cheer yet, especially after three successive years of drought witnessed by the state. For the next two days, heavy to very heavy rainfall is expected in Uttara Kannada and Udupi districts, while heavy rain is expected in most parts of the state. This year the onset of the monsoon was helped by successive cyclonic conditions in the Arabian Sea. This was the reason why Mangaluru and other coastal parts of the state experienced heavy spells of rainfall in the month of May. Even other parts of the state, including Bengaluru, saw good pre-monsoon rainfall due to local weather systems. But the Indian Meteorological Department has predicted that as a whole, the state is likely to receive below normal rainfall. “For all of south India, normal to below normal rainfall is expected. We are not expecting excess rain anywhere,” Sunil M Gavaskar, meteorologist at the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre (KSNDMC) told TNM. “The second stage long-range forecast by IMD is that the south peninsula will have 95% rainfall compared to LPA (long period average), which is a little lower than its first state forecast,” he said. Speaking on the probability of another drought year, KSNDMC director Srinivas Reddy says it's too early to call, saying there is no way to gauge region-wise rainfall. “Monsoon variability is very high - it varies from area to area even within regions. All over the country, we are expecting 95% normal rainfall in July and 100% in June. Other private agencies have also speculated almost the same thing. For me, again, the only worry is about the distribution,” he said. “A 5% or 10% deficit is not a problem for Karnataka, but the problem is with the rainfall distribution in the state. If the distribution all over the state is uniform, that is enough for us, even with a 10% deficit,” he said. “Only after an incident happens, we will come to know. Otherwise, there is no way to predict area-specific drought. We are prepared for any eventuality,” he said. The state is still reeling under the effect of the three drought years. “Right now, many reservoirs are not having sufficient water. But for the next one week, we are expecting good rainfall in the catchment areas of all these reservoirs, mostly coastal and Malnad region, during which we are expecting a good inflow to the reservoirs,” Sunil added. However, bountiful pre-monsoon showers have resulted in better water levels compared to 2017. In fact, this year, Karnataka witnessed the best pre-monsoon rainfall compared to the last 5 years, with 39% rainfall above normal. However, Karnataka’s Agriculture Commissioner G Satish is optimistic with the IMD predictions. “We are definitely looking forward to a good agricultural year. Karnataka is a major cereal producing state and, with a good monsoon, we expect good tur crop and with improved water inflow in our reservoirs we look forward to paddy production,” he told TNM.

Schools and colleges in Dakshina Kannada, Udupi closed as IMD predicts heavy rain

$
0
0
Weather
Life was brought to a halt as rain lashed these districts last week. With this in mind, authorities declared that schools, colleges should be shut on Friday and Saturday.
PTI | Image for Representation
Dakshina Kannada and Udupi district authorities on Friday announced a holiday for all schools and colleges in the district over fears of a fresh bout of heavy rains in the area.  The announcement was first made by Dakshina Kannada Deputy Commissioner Sasikanth Senthil and will apply for all schools and colleges in the district for Friday and Saturday.   Later, taking cognisance of the fact that rains had been predicted in Udupi too, the district administration declared a two-day holiday for schools in the district. Students who had already reached school were sent back after the holiday was confirmed. The Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) had predicted "scattered heavy to very heavy rainfall" with "isolated extremely heavy" rains in the district, warning authorities to take action soon. The same warning was also issued for the South Konkan and Goa regions.  Officials at the Dakshina Kannada DC office confirmed that the decision was taken after heavy rains lashed the city and its surrounding areas in the night. 144mm rain was reported in Mangaluru, while 129 mm rainfall was reported in Bantwal and 124 mm in Puttur."The decision to declare a holiday has been taken in anticipation of heavy rains in the district. We received an alert from the Karnataka State Natural Disaster Monitoring Centre that heavy rains are expected on Friday. We are also wary of what happened last week," said an official at Dakshina Kannada DC office.  A week ago, the onset of monsoon brought life in Mangaluru to a grinding halt after heavy rains inundated parts of the city. Three persons were confirmed dead and extensive damage was reported as trees and electric poles were uprooted in several areas, damaging parked vehicles. Several residents took to social media to offer help to people left stranded by the rains.#Staysafekudla  and #Mangalorerains were trending on social media as residents threw open their doors to accommodate strangers.

Partial release for Rajinikanth’s ‘Kaala’ in Karnataka amid protests in some cities

$
0
0
Controversy
The Karnataka Rakshana Vedike managed to stall the release in several Bengaluru theatres, including those in Lido Mall, Mantri Mall and Forum Mall.
There was little to celebrate for Rajinikanth fans in Karnataka as the superstar's latest film Kaala was screened in only a few theatres in the state. This, after a fervent attempt by fringe pro-Kannada groups to stall the release of the film on Thursday. While theatres in Bengaluru only began screening the film in the afternoon, the film was screened in Ballari and Hosapete amid protests by pro-Kannada activists. The Karnataka Rakshana Vedike, which spearheaded the efforts to stop the screening of the film, managed to stall its release in several Bengaluru theatres, including those in Lido Mall, Mantri Mall and Forum Mall, and also in single screen theatres like Balaji Theatre in Vivek Nagar and Urvashi Theatre in Sudhama Nagar. The film was also stalled from releasing in theatres in Mandya, Mysuru, Hubbali, Raichur, Shivamogga and Koppal. In Ballari, a group of pro-Kannada activists got into a heated confrontation with officials at Radhika Cinema. They were reportedly unhappy that the theatre was issuing tickets to movie-goers. A similar scenario played out in Hosapete. However, the film was screened in spite of the activists resorting to a sit-in dharna outside the theatre to halt the screening. Even though police had arrived as early as 5 am in some theatres, many exhibitors feared that protesters would overrun the theatres and damage property. Meanwhile, shows in Mangaluru went ahead as planned without any reported disturbances. RS Srinivas, the movie’s distributor in Karnataka (except Ballari), said, “It is disappointing that there were no morning shows, but theatres began screening the film in the afternoon. By end of day we had about 50 screens and we are confident of another 125 screens showing it from tomorrow (Friday) morning,” speaking to Times of India. Shows are expected to run as per schedule on Friday, the second day of the film's run in the state. Read: Pro-Kannada groups go from theatre to theatre ensuring ‘Kaala’ isn’t screened in B’luru

Bengaluru’s Embassy Tech Village receives bomb threat, employees evacuated

$
0
0
Bomb threat
The police say it could be a prank call but employees have been evacuated as it is standard operating procedure.
Aadithi Shetty/Twitter
Update: The call was a hoax. Bengaluru’s Embassy Tech Village, situated on Outer Ring Road received a bomb threat call on Friday, after which employees of organisations in the park were asked to assemble at a safe point. The threat call was received at the Cisco office located inside the tech park.  Thousands of employees working at organisations such as Sony, Cisco and were evacuated at around 2 pm. The Sony office has been sealed. Bomb squads and sniffer dogs are at the spot. DCP Whitefield Abdul Ahad confirmed that a threat call was received, and was likely a prank. As many as 7,000 employees were evacuated, the police added. “Yes, a threat call which we believe is mostly a prank call received around 1 pm. Someone speaking in Hindi said there would be a bomb blast in 10 minutes. The call was received at the Cisco office at Embassy Tech Village, which is next to Cessna Business Park in Marathahalli. We have evacuated people and the bomb squad is at the spot, which is a standard operating procedure. The call came as a VoIP call. We have contacted Cyber Crime to trace the call,” the DCP said. Located at the Outer Ring Road in Bengaluru, Embassy Tech Village hosts a group of multinational companies like Cisco, Altimerk, Moody’s Analytics, Sony and Wells Fargo.  A lot of employees have tweeted that they have been asked to assemble at safe points outside the building.  All offices in Embassy tech village has been asked to be evacuated pic.twitter.com/TRWGFxroUH — यतो धर्मस्ततो जयः॥ (@saivenkat1106) June 8, 2018 Seems there has been a "bomb" hoax call at Embassy Tech Village. 1000's of employees have been evacuated and the buildings have been sealed.— comrade (@comrade82537013) June 8, 2018 @ArnabOffice bomb threat in embassy tech village Bangalore people are being evacuated pic.twitter.com/WyclNSujr3 — Rakeshkumarsaini (@rakesh275358) June 8, 2018 However, some employees alleged that while the police had asked the tech park to not let people to enter the buildings for two hours, some organisations were forcing their employees to get back to their desks. "We did not get an email communication about the threat. And after we gathered at the safe assembly space, we were informed by Embassy Tech Park that no one should enter for two hours. However, our organisation started calling us on phone, and asked us to get back to work. The security at individual buildings are already letting people back inside," a person who works at an IT company in the tech park said. The tech park issued a statement regarding the same: “A bomb threat call was made to an employee of Cisco, operating out of Embassy TechVillage at midday today. As a precaution and in accordance with our standard operating procedures, the relevant buildings were evacuated and the Police and Fire authorities attended the scene. All office buildings and basements within the business park were checked by the police and declared clear. Employees have now been permitted to move back into the buildings. We continue to take all measures to ensure the safety of our corporate occupiers in accordance with our Incident Management protocols and, in accordance with those Standard Operating Procedures, will be carrying out a full incident and response review.”

In Mandya, trans women are being driven out of villages controlled by unelected headmen

$
0
0
LGBTQI+
Unelected village heads in Induvala put pressure on house owners to evict trans women. And since then, the women have been struggling to find a stable roof over their heads.
“Nobody we spoke to gave us a reason for it. One day, out of the blue, we were asked to leave the village,” says Ramya*, who recalls the harrowing phone call from her house owner in vivid detail but finds it hard to remember when exactly it happened. Crouched low in a corner of Vishweshwaraya Park in Mandya, her fingers sift through a dossier of documents as she tries to search for the exact dates when her life plunged into disarray. “It was in early 2016, around March. The few months around that is a blur,” she says with an expressionless face.   Ramya (30), a transgender woman and activist, and over 70 members of the transgender community were asked to leave Induvala, a tiny, unassuming village in Mandya district, in March 2016. It has been more than two years since the incident occured but it still dictates much of Ramya’s daily life. “Many transgender persons who left Induvala, including me, are yet to find stable housing even now,” she says.   The decision to ask all transgender persons to leave the village was taken by the ‘gowdas’ or heads of the village; they claim, they received complaints from residents about misdemeanours of some members of the community. “We started receiving complaints from the people that transgender persons are roaming the village roads in the night and that they are stealing from people. So we decided to tell them, respectfully, to leave the village,” says Chandrashekar Gowda, one of the nine heads of Induvala. Chandrashekhar Gowda, one of the nine village heads of induvala in Mandya He says that the alleged misdemeanours were committed by a few members of the transgender community, but admits that the decision affected every transgender person living in the village. When pressed for a reason for the decision, he says, "Our boys were being spoilt by them (transgender persons).” ‘We told them to vacate in 3 months’ The village heads communicated their decision to house owners in Induvala, who in turn asked members of the transgender community to leave the village. “We never even talked to the them!” reveals Chandrashekhar, with a hint of pride in his voice. “We told house owners that it is a question of protecting our people, and the house owners supported us. All transgender persons were asked to vacate the village within three months and nobody was cheated,” he adds. A house owner in Induvala, who did not wish to be named, corroborated the sequence of events. “I would say most transgender women who lived in the village were good people. They minded their own business, but the people in our village saw that the community was united. When you spoke to four transgender women, there was a feeling that 40 would back them up. So, the village heads asked us to vacate all transgender persons,” the house owner, who had leased his house to two transgender women, reveals. Gram Panchayat Office in Induvala, Mandya District authorities scoff at reports Mandya district authorities claim to be unaware of the drive to evict transgender persons from villages, and also dismiss the idea of village heads taking decisions related to governance. “Only the law is in place in this district,” says G Radhika, Superintendent of Police (SP) for Mandya district, when asked about Ramya’s claims and appealed for time to investigate. The SP’s words are echoed by BP Vijay, Additional District Commissioner of Mandya district, who scoffs at the idea of village headmen. “In this democratic setup, the concept of a village headman has lost its relevance. It is almost too good to be true,” he says. BP Vijay, Additional District Commissioner, Mandya Village controlled by unelected headmen But in Induvala, just 4 km from Mandya, the local village heads are more powerful than district authorities like to believe. Although officially unrecognised in many parts of Mandya, the nine gowdas of Induvala are indeed an influential local justice system. They rule over the village without the help of the elected government machinery. The ruling power of the village heads is recognised by residents and Gram Panchayat members alike. “The village heads take decisions in the village, whether it is related to festivals or to settle disputes between residents. They have the control and they wanted to take care of the village, so they asked the transgender women to leave,” says Kare Gowda, a Gram Panchayat member from Induvala. The transgender community had no option but to scatter to nearby villages. Ramya’s life was uprooted as she was forced to move out of her house in Induvala to Raagimuddanahalli, around 8 km away. “A few people went to Mandya, a few others went to Thoobinakere and then a few like me settled in Raagimuddanahalli,” she says. Ramya (30) was forced to vacate from two villages in the last two years Even though most people who lived in Induvala had resettled in nearby villages, the relationship between transgender persons and other residents of the villages continued to remain strained after the news of their departure from Induvala spread through the district. ‘Nobody believed us’ The simmering tensions flared up once again in July 2017, when a resident of Thoobinakere, around 4 km away from Induvala, accused a transgender woman of accosting him on the road, taking money from him and forcing him into sex. In conversation with residents of Thoobinakere, two versions of the incident emerged: one, where the trans woman allegedly assaulted the resident, and another, where the resident forced himself on the trans woman. The incident led to clashes between some of the original residents of the village, and members of the transgender community. “They had taken money from our boy. So we went to them and a fight started,” says Sridhara, a resident of Thoobinakere, recalling the sequence of events. “I don’t deny that there were good people among them too. But you had to question them. They were in Induvala and were driven away from there, weren’t they?” he asks. “The trans women block the roads and do business. They also touch people inappropriately and demand money,” adds Sridhara. D Nagaraju, President of Thoobinakere Gram Panchayat, and several other Gram Panchayat members further allege that the trans women also resorted to stealing and gambling. (Pictured Extreme Left) D Nagaraju, President of Thoobinakere Gram Panchayat  However, Ramya, who rushed to Thoobinakere following the incident, says that the transgender person in question was innocent. “Nobody believed us when we claimed innocence. Not the media nor the police,” she says. Police officials at Thoobinakere police station who investigated the incident did not file a case, and instead asked the people involved to reach a compromise. Thoobinakere Gram Panchayat, Mandya Displaced once again This incident in Thoobinakere further led to the local residents villainising the transgender community. Every rumour about transgender persons, real or fake, provoked paranoia. “When the incident happened, any trouble caused by transgender persons in the village was analysed and over-analysed. Suddenly, we turned into outsiders all over again,” says Ramya. What happened in Induvala, repeated itself in Thoobinakere where members of the transgender community were asked to leave the village as part of the compromise struck between the two parties involved in the fight. But word travels fast, and the effects of the fallout in Thoobinakere spilled into Raagimuddanahalli, where Ramya was living. Raagimuddanahalli, Mandya “When trouble kicked off in Thoobinakere, the transgender persons in our village decided to leave in order to avoid any problems,” says Ramesh, a house owner of a transgender tenant in Raagimuddanahalli. “We returned the advance they had paid and sent them on their way,” he says. Picking up her bags once more, Ramya left Raagimuddanahalli in January this year, and now resides closer to a city. She wishes not to reveal her location for fear of further persecution. ' Ramesh, a house owner at Raagimuddanahalli, Mandya  Voter IDs don’t change attitudes According to activists, over 350 transgender persons live in Mandya district. Members of the transgender community were given hope this year when district authorities concentrated efforts to make voter IDs for them, ahead of the state Assembly elections. The Election Department of the DC Office in Mandya says that 130 transgender persons registered to vote and 27 of them voted in the elections held on May 15. But the community members reveal that in spite of having a voter ID card, their identities are questioned by house owners, and that they face an uphill battle with the owners to let them stay. Ramya had to strike a deal with her landlady, “I had to appeal to the owner to let me stay for three months. I asked her to judge my behaviour in this period and then take a decision. She now says I can stay as long as I like.” Raagimuddanahalli, Mandya Insecurity, and constant fear of violence The experiences of Induvala and Thoobinakere continue to haunt members of the community, even as they live in fear of being woken up in the middle of the night only to face violence. Gauri*, a transgender woman who used to live in Kallalli, near Mandya, reveals how a man forcibly entered her home one night. “A man came to our house at 2 am when I was alone. He was drunk and picked a fight with me,” she says. “I was screaming and running on the road and yet no one responded,” she says, describing the harrowing incident that occurred in January this year. The incident, like many other atrocities against transgender persons in Mandya, was never reported to the police. “No complaints by transgender persons are taken up by the police. On most occasions, they are never reported,” Gauri says. This was confirmed by the SP, who says that the police is yet to register a case in the district in which a transgender person is the complainant. Even though the state government introduced the Karnataka State Transgender Policy in October 2017, which guarantees water supply, sanitation, housing and other basic rights, transgender activists and members of the transgender community say that almost no action has been taken to implement the recommendations made in the policy. Even Akkai Padmashali, the face of transgender welfare in Karnataka, has had to struggle to find a house – she recently created campaigns on crowdfunding platforms Ketto and BitGiving, to raise money to buy a house. Transgender persons across the state revealed that they have to assert their dignity and humanity in order to be recognised by other residents. The allegation of wrongdoing against one becomes the sin of all in the eyes of the community.   “If a man makes a mistake does that mean all men make mistakes? Why are the rules different for transgender persons?” asks Gauri. Gauri (27) appeals for police officials to be sensitive to transgender persons She also appeals for police protection to be given to transgender persons and for police officials to be sensitive to the needs of the LGBTQI+ community. “Transgender persons should be given police protection and we should be able to approach police officials easily,” she says, adding that transgender persons do not want to be isolated. “We should be given secure houses and not be driven away from villages. If this continues, we will be further isolated from the residents in Mandya,” she says. With a secure roof over their head, she says that community members can concentrate on other ways they can improve their lives – by searching for different kinds of jobs, applying for ration cards and so on. “I want to open my own business, if I am able to secure the resources for it,” she says with the first inkling of a smile on her face. But she is quick to add, “Before I dream of that, we should first get justice.” *Names changed on request All photographs by Dhruv Khanna and Soham Kundu

'Maasti Gudi’ tragedy: Duniya Vijay picked up by cops, released after he signs bond

$
0
0
Crime
An FIR was filed against the actor for obstructing the police from arresting P Sundar Gowda, the producer of the movie and the accused in the case, last month.
Duniya Vijay – who has been absconding for almost a year and a half after the Maasti Gudi tragedy, which led to the deaths of two Kannada actors – has been picked up by the police in Tamil Nadu and has been brought to Bengaluru. An FIR was filed against the actor for obstructing the police from arresting P Sundar Gowda, the producer of the movie and the accused in the case, last month. “Duniya Vijay was picked up by the Bengaluru police from a resort in Coimbatore and was brought to the Channammanakere Achukattu Police station after which he was let go after signing a bond of Rs 50,000,” said the police. The police said that Vijay was absconding after he had applied for an anticipatory bail and they were able to track him down with the help of mobile towers. Last month, the court of the Ramanagara judicial magistrate first class issued a warrant to arrest P Sundar Gowda. “When the Tavarekere Police arrived at Sundar Gowda’s house, Duniya Vijay and the accused were discussing the plan of action. Sundar Gowda told the officers that he would go in and change his clothes. Within minutes, he had escaped from the house,” the police said. Channammanakere Achukattu Police Inspector Sharanappa told TNM that Duniya Vijay had helped Sundar Gowda escape from his residence and avoid arrest. “He told the Tavarekere Police that Sundar Gowda’s mother’s health condition was deteriorating and that he would personally hand over Sundar Gowda to the police in a day’s time. According to the Tavarekere Police, Duniya Vijay assaulted one of the police officers on duty. The Tavarekere Police had, by then, figured out that Duniya Vijay was the one who helped Sundar Gowda escape,” Inspector Sharanappa said. An FIR was registered under IPC sections 353 (assault or criminal force to deter a public servant from discharging duty) and 225 (resistance or obstruction of lawful apprehension of a person). In November 2016, the film crew of Maasti Gudi had gone to the Thippagondanahalli Reservoir to shoot the climax of the film. The stunt, which was being performed featured three actors –  Duniya Vijay, Uday and Anil – jumping off a helicopter from a height of 100ft. In the videos that have surfaced since the incident, Vijay is seen wearing safety gear while the other two actors don't have any harness. Minutes before the stunt was attempted, Anil and Uday had told a news channel covering the shooting that they did not know swimming. After jumping into the water, the actors began to struggle. While Vijay, who was wearing protective gear, managed to reach a coracle and get rescued, the other two actors drowned. Following the incident, there was public outcry regarding the lack of safety measures and proper procedures for shooting dangerous stunts. Many also condemned the film unit for its callousness towards the safety and well-being of junior artistes. Read: ‘Maasti Gudi’ tragedy: FIR registered against Duniya Vijay for helping accused escape
Viewing all 17404 articles
Browse latest View live